K League 1

A same-season peer fingerprint of how this competition behaves—not a ranking of which league is “best”.

CONFIDENCEB

MATCHES175

PEER LEAGUES59

OBSERVED COVERAGE68.0

LEAGUE FINGERPRINTleague-dna-v0.1-research

Scoring environmentHome advantageLate dramaDiscipline heatFormation diversityCompetitive parity

ALL NINE DIMENSIONSsame-season percentiles

Scoring environment

Shot volume

Home advantage

Draw tendency

Late drama

Comeback frequency

Discipline heat

Formation diversity

Competitive parity

OBSERVATION COVERAGEmissing data is never zero-filled

Events100%

Lineups97%

Shot Statistics47%

Reconciled Timelines100%

Possession Statistics47%

LEAGUE SIGNATURErelative extremes

MOST DISTINCTIVE HIGH TRAITS

Draw tendency84

Competitive parity84

Late drama52

LOW RELATIVE TRAITS

Home advantage4

Shot volume4

Team DNA currently withheld

—

WHAT THE NUMBERS MEANpublication contract

Peer-relative, not absolute

Each dimension is a percentile against eligible leagues from the same season-year cohort. A 90 means unusually high relative behaviour, not “90% good”.

Minimum peer cohort

League DNA is withheld when fewer than six eligible same-year peers exist. Current-only maintenance still uses the full frozen A/B peer authority.

Coverage-aware

Events, lineups, shots and reconciled timelines carry separate observed denominators. Missing observations do not become zeroes.

Versioned lineage

Every published snapshot records its model version, observation window and SHA-256 source manifest for reproducibility.

Cryptographic source lineage6cfeeb013f0bdba5a22023476016b0ddf7150858d96761214552a649a0ec04de